top of page
Christopher Palmieri, CAS 2026 Middle School Principal of the Year 				PHILIP THIBODEAU PHOTOS
Christopher Palmieri, CAS 2026 Middle School Principal of the Year PHILIP THIBODEAU PHOTOS

The tie and jacket combo, the lanyard around his neck bearing the period schedule for the school’s three grades, the office decorated with mementos and inspirational posters – it's the sort of thing you might expect to see when meeting Connecticut’s Middle School Principal of the Year.


But there’s one thing you might not expect – the box of chicken eggs, freshly gathered from the nest, that he's carrying in his hands.


Just before the Outsider came to interview him, Palmieri had been outside attending to the coup that DePaolo Middle School maintains on the farm property next door. Each day he visits the chickens, usually with a small team of student assistants, to check their water and food and collect any eggs they might have laid. The routine allows Palmieri to teach the kids something about caretaking and responsibility. It also gives him a chance to open a line of communication with the students, and let them experience responsibilities as a source of pride and fun.


“To me this job all about connecting with the kids. I remember every day, it’s kids first. I love that quote up there,” he says, gesturing to a poster on his office wall. “‘Children are not a distraction from the more important work. They are the most important work.’ I love it because everything I do, everything the staff does, has to be student-centered.”


Palmieri does a lot of things of that sort at DePaolo. Some activities have him taking kids across the street to Calendar House to volunteer. Others bring principal and students to the animal shelter on Woodruff Street, or the nursery school at Zion Lutheran. The press release from the Connecticut Association of Schools announcing his honor mentions the students who, under his guidance, participate in running the Apple Harvest Festival.


“The kids are so inquisitive at this age. They’re mature, not quite elementary, but they’re not adults either. It’s a time to help them be what they want to be. I want to expose them to many experiences so they can develop into the people they want to be.”


It was the in-between character of middle school students that originally helped him make up his mind to become an educator.


“My undergraduate degree was actually in business administration. After my freshman year, I started substituting in New Britain, where at the time you didn’t need a degree. I started subbing there, and I started getting a passion for it there. So I knew I liked teaching, but there was a missing piece.”


“When I graduated, I started in the middle schools. And that was the missing piece - teaching middle school.”


One of the main challenges in teaching middle school students is helping them to keep the rush of adolescent energies under control in a way that allows them to think and to learn. Along with its dedication to academics and community service, there is a pervasive focus at DePaolo on emotional learning. For that, Palmieri says he has benefited a great deal from a program at Yale that has pioneered this approach to education.


“We have done a lot with Yale’s emotional intelligence program, which is called RULER. It’s run by Marc Brackett. We’ve learn so much from it.”


On his office wall Palmieri has a Mood Meter poster that he uses each day with the students in his advisory group. According to the RULER website, the purpose of the Mood Meter is to “enhance self- and social-awareness and support the development of a nuanced emotion vocabulary and a range of strategies for regulating emotion.”


Palmieri explaining the Mood Meter.
Palmieri explaining the Mood Meter.

Emotional intelligence is not just something students work on individually. Classroom groups, and even the entire school have sought to articulate how they want to feel – and by extension, how they want to be treated – when they are at school. Everyone from students to teachers and administrators takes part in creating it, and thus everyone has a stake in seeing it work.


“We came up with a charter which asks, how do we want to feel when we are together? We created the question, and you’ll see the answers in the classrooms. Before they can start their learning, student need to be emotionally in a place where they can learn.”


“I’ll show you when we walk out into the hall the one we did a whole school charter as well. The students and the staff all signed it. It’s a honeycomb, a beehive, like a community.”


Palmieri showing off the whole school charter.
Palmieri showing off the whole school charter.

After demonstrating the charter, Palmieri made his way to the cafeteria where DePaolo’s 6th grade lunch was underway. The room was just as crowded as a beehive and as loud, with hundreds of students chatting at the tables with their friends. At the entrance there was a constant stream of students coming and going with bathroom-pass lanyards in hand as they took their last chance for a break before lunch ended.


Grabbing a microphone, Palmieri started calling out the names of students who had won rewards for completing an extra-credit math assignment. The dozen or so who were called came up to claim small bags of chips or popcorn. Each one made their way to the front of the cafe, looked their principal in the eye, and picked out their prize before walking back to their tables.


It’s a big school, with 674 young people. Yet in the space of about five minutes, Palmieri had made a connection with another set of students, those who had taken the initiative to do a bit more academic work. It’s part of his constant effort to build bridges from the world of childhood to the world of adulthood, and invite students to cross it – an effort for which he has now been recognized.





Indoor Track & Field Girls and Boys Captains
Indoor Track & Field Girls and Boys Captains

Faced with a winter as tough as the recent one, most people chose to bundle up inside. Not the high school indoor track & field team, however. This year’s Blue Knights weren’t going to let frigid temperatures stop them from reaching their potential. Southington’s hard work and dedication have paid off, as the boys and the girls squads both won the Central Connecticut Conference South Division.

 

Before CCCs, co-head coaches Nick Migani and Jaclyn Sullivan asked their team a simple question. They knew they’d have to battle against conference powerhouses such as Bloomfield, Windsor, and Glastonbury. But given the team Southington had assembled in 2026, why couldn’t they take home the conference crown?

 

“It would be silly to go into it not being like, ‘Can we be CCC South Division champions? Can we win our division, can we battle these teams who want the same thing as us and really go after it together?’,” Sullivan said. “I want to throw down with those teams. Even if we supposedly can’t win, whatever, why can’t it be us at some point? Why can’t we go for it?”

 

“At some point we’ve got to say, ‘Hey maybe we’re not there yet, but why not us?’ That’s really the mentality we’re trying to foster on them,” Migani added. “You’ve got to fake it a little before you make it. Let’s go out there and expect to compete with some of the best teams in New England, hold ourselves to their standard. We should go out and compete with them, not just be happy to be there. Instead of chasing these teams, we should think we belong.”


Southington wins CCC South


This self-confidence paid off. Southington girls indoor track and field scored a 142 to win the South. They posted a 24.33 in the overall competition, coming in seventh. Every competitor listed below qualified for All-Conference with their results.

 

Senior Katherine Cavanaugh finished second in the 3200-meters (11:24.22) and fourth in the 1600 (5:14). Fellow senior Adriana Paszkowski placed seventh in the high jump (4’ 6”) and ninth in the 55-meter hurdles (9.48). Junior Sarah Fares earned a third place finish in the shot put (35’  6.5”). Freshman Emily Phipps placed 12th in the 3200 (12:27.87) while junior Martha Siwek finished 12th in the high jump (4’ 4”).

 

In the pole vault, senior Riley Bassett finished sixth (8’6”), junior Josephine Martin finished seventh (8' 0”) and sophomore Gabriella Paskowski finished ninth (7’ 0”). For the 1000-meters, freshman Madeleine Canner-O’Mealy placed ninth (3:13.15), fellow freshman Giada Pagnucco finished 15th (3:20.79) and senior Shaelyn Flaherty came in 21st (3:26.03).

 

Southington’s 4x800 relay team of Phipps, senior Jenna Hebert and freshmen Emily Blankenship and Giuliana Angieri came in fifth (10:53.18). The 1600 sprint medley relay team of Siwek, Pagnucco, Canner-O’Mealy and sophomore Olivia Ostopawicz finished eighth (4:40.83) while the 4x400 team of Hebert, Flaherty, Pagnucco and Canner-O’Mealy came in ninth (4:36.38).

 

The boys too reaped the benefit from believing in themselves. The Blue Knights won the South with a score of 125. Their 37 points in the overall competition led to a fourth place finish. Everyone listed below has made All-CCCs.

 

Junior Walker Mierzejewski finished fourth in the 55-meters (6.61) while senior Chimdi Ogubagu placed fifth (6.62). Senior Ethan Hoffman finished fourth in the 1000 (2:38.76) while junior Cole Hinckley placed sixth in the 600 (1:28). Junior Michael Blankenship came in eighth in the 3200 (10:03.44) as Senior Luke Wolf was 10th in the 55-meter hurdles (8.39).

 

Junior Sam Cheek was 13th in the 1600 (4:49.93) as sophomore Berenger Xavier finished 16th in the 300 (37.65). In the shot put, junior Jason Kalawat finished fifth (45’ 4.5”) while senior Jaiden Livers came in sixth (44’ 10.5”).

 

The Blue Knights’ 4x200 relay team of Ogubagu, Mierzejewski, Hinckley and Xavier won the event with a time of 1:33.32. Southington’s 1600 sprint medley relay team of Mierzejewski, Wolf, and sophomores Ryan Andrews and Logan Perrella placed fourth (3:51.16). The 4x400 team of Wolf, Hinckley, Andrews and senior Croix Pugliese came in fifth (3:41.70) while the 4x800 team of Blankenship, Perrella, senior Jayden Gajewski and junior Stephen Rahenkamp placed sixth (8:42.46).

 

For both squads, Sullivan felt Southington’s CCC fully encapsulated the team’s ‘why not us’ attitude.

 

“I think the athletes really took our ‘why not us?’ message to heart. Event after event, both the boys and girls stepped up with tenacity, putting themselves in the best possible position to help the team,” Sullivan said. “The 4x200 relay set the tone with their first place finish and from there the energy only grew. When they weren’t competing, the athletes were on their feet cheering and supporting one another. It was special to see the team come together around a shared goal and deliver the performances they did.”



Indoor Track Teams Combine As One


Sullivan, who is also head coach of the girls outdoor track team, has unofficially been coaching indoor track alongside Migani for the past three seasons. During the 2026 campaign, the Blue Knights moved to an official co-head coach structure with both Migani and Sullivan leading the way.

 

Seeing all sides of the Blue Knights has only made the program stronger. Each member of the coaching staff is able to give input no matter the team. In turn, Southington’s athletes have an opportunity to compete as one.

 

“With indoor track in general, all the coaches coach together because of the facilities and the nature of having 100+ kids and six or seven coaches,” Sullivan said. “It’s great that indoor track allows for that opportunity. The boys and girls are different programs, different teams. But it’s fun to see them train together. Working with Nick and the other coaches makes it fun and easy for everyone.”

 

“It has been great,” Migani added. “The coaches coach with all the kids regardless of their gender. When we’re now creating things like the postseason lineups, all the coaches know all the kids. We’re able to bring all of the knowledge bases. It allows us to put it all together as a team as opposed to divided by gender. It lines up easily and naturally.”

 

On the boys side, many of this year’s competitors were coming off of a long football season. That offered the coaching staff an opportunity to work with many of the new runners. The girls team has plenty of new faces on the roster this season. Sullivan said those young runners have played a crucial role in the Blue Knights’ success, while the veterans have helped keep the team on course.

 

Everyone on the team had the same goal in mind. The returners were able to see the Blue Knights’ continued growth. Southington knew they had the opportunity to put together a special season.

 

“This has been a long time coming,” Migani said. “When we first started here, we felt that three years on, we were going to be in a position to be competitive at CCCs and LL level. Last outdoor, it really came together, with the kids buying into the program and the culture, seeing into the future. This year, the kids are really knowledgeable about what we’re trying to do. Now they’ve bought in and integrated any new kids coming in.”

 

Perhaps the biggest hurdle standing in their way has been the daunting weather. While they are the indoor track team, most of the Blue Knights’ practice happens outside. As Migani puts it, “90 percent of the time, 85 percent of our athletes are outside.” Many teams are looking to use the gym in the winter, and the athletes need enough space to get their work in.  

 

Still, that is part of the battle that comes with competing in indoor track. While it could be grueling, looking back and seeing how far you’ve come is the ultimate reward.

 

“Indoor track is the easiest team to sign up for. It’s also one of the hardest teams to be a part of,” Migani said. “Becoming part of the team is showing up when it’s negative something degrees out and getting better because you need to get better for your team. Staying when it’s still dark, or attending those five, six, seven, 10 hour meets. Those areas are where we see this team coming together. You have to have some shared misery. It really brings them together.”

 

Southington’s Newest Record Holders, Captains


Indoor track & field doesn’t follow the traditional win-loss schedule. Instead, the Blue Knights compete in invitationals throughout the season. Each coach is able to see how far each athlete has been able to progress. By the time the postseason comes around, Southington already knows how to operate and what it will take to succeed at the highest level.

 

As the Blue Knights go through their campaign, they are looking to see if anyone will break a school record. During the 2026 season, Southington had numerous athletes do so.

 

Cavanaugh broke – or in Sullivan’s words, “smashed”  - her own 3,000-meter school record with a time of 10:24:



In Ogubagu’s first meet of the season - after transferring from football due to injuries - he set Southington’s 55-meter record, before breaking it yet again with a time of 6.57.

 

Mierzejewski is the new 200-meter record holder with a time of 22.79, while Kalwat took the weight throw crown with a distance of 58’ 0.5”. In their first attempt of the season, the boys’ 4x200 relay team became school record holders with a mark of 1:31.86.

 

In addition to setting school records, Cavanaugh is a captain of the girls’ team next to fellow seniors Hebert and Adriana Paskowski. To Sullivan, all three have helped elevate the culture she is trying to help build with the Blue Knights. 

 

“They’ve brought a lot of communication, positive team culture, encouragement between all event groups, really just phenomenal leadership,” Sullivan said. “I see them as an extension of the coaching staff. They have a lot of experience and knowledge. They’re open and willing to help everyone and still focus on their own events.”

 

For the boys, Hoffman, Wolf, seniors Nicholas Fusco, Zachary Belcourt and junior William Wu are captains. All five are intent on moving the Blue Knights forward. But it’s important to the captains that Southington has fun doing it.

 

“The boys team is a little bit different, they’re a rambunctious group,” Migani said. “They maintain the best they can, the organization, the routine, the expectations. But they really keep it fun. Running outside in this weather is not fun. We tend to lose some of that engagement when it is negative something and snowy. Our captains have done a great job of saying, ‘Hey we can work hard and have fun.’ That’s helped our culture. Making sure the kids are coming back, and when they’re here, they’re getting in good work, it isn’t just a mess around type of day.”

 

Outside of the captains, Migani was quick to praise athletes like Hinckley, who moved from short sprinter to long sprinter, making major strides in the process. Likewise Xavier, who as only a sophomore has managed to make a pivotal impact. Kalwat, the reigning outdoor track & field javelin champion, and Livers have come up clutch for the Blue Knights in the throwing events.


For the girls, Sullivan has been impressed with many of Southington’s newcomers this season. Joining the team as a sophomore, Ostapowicz has become a staple on the Blue Knights’ sprint teams. Angieri and Canner-O’Mealy broke SHS freshman records in the 600 and 1,000 respectively, qualifying for the Class LL State Tournament.


Blue Knights Always Ready To Battle


Southington competed in the Class LL State Tournament on February 14. Both the boys and girls finished 10th overall, with scores of 18 and 18.5 respectively. Full results can be found here.

 

As they close out their postseason, Southington’s coaches are looking for both teams to capitalize on their success. They understand the level of competition they’ll be facing. But they have put in the work all year for these kinds of races.

 

When the Blue Knights return to compete next season, plenty of talented seniors will have graduated from the program. Still, Sullivan isn’t expecting Southington’s standards to drop. Indoor track & field is often seen as an individual sport. This year’s squad didn’t view the sport that way, helping build the foundation on which the Blue Knights want to stand.

 

“The fact that they’re willing to view it as a team sport is what’s helping them standout,” Sullivan said. “The team is not complete without each other. These kids are willing to literally put their bodies on the line to want to achieve a performance for themselves, but know that it’s really for a bigger goal, and for their team.”

 

Through the snow and cold, the Blue Knights trudged forward. Southington wanted to show the state of Connecticut just how good they can be. But to reach the heights they did, this year’s team needed to do it together.

 

“It draws them closer together, everyone is in it,” Migani said. “No one is skipping the hard part. As a team, is really where they’re showing growth. A freak can show up and do freakish things. It takes a team to come together to really do something special.”









 

Flanders Elementary School								PHILIP THIBODEAU PHOTOS
Flanders Elementary School PHILIP THIBODEAU PHOTOS

An ambitious rebuilding plan that will affect four of the town’s eight elementary schools will receive the first in a series of critical votes this Thursday evening when Board of Education members gather at the Weichsel Center for their bi-monthly meeting.

 

If it wins the necessary support – first from the Board of Education, then from the Board of Finance, Town Council, and finally voters at a referendum – the construction plan, which is known as D-2 for short, would be rolled out in two phases.

 

In the first, an updated Kelley School would be built in the open field behind the existing structure; once this is ready, the old building would be demolished. At the same time, five new classrooms would be added to the existing building at South End School. This work would be completed by the start of the 2029-2030 school year. At that point Flanders would be shut down, with its students and staff redistricted to nearby schools.

 

In the second phase, which would get underway that same year, a new, smaller Derynoski School would be constructed in the field below the existing one, along with a dedicated building for special-needs students, the Karen Smith Academy. Once the new structure is occupied, it would be up to the town to decide what to do with the old Derynoski and Flanders buildings. 

 

The Board of Education already voted at its May 8 meeting last year to move ahead with phase one of the rebuild, postponing a decision on phase two. Recently, however, the Republican caucus on Town Council signaled that it was unwilling to throw its support behind any rebuild unless the Board voted to approve phases one and two together.

 

The reason for this move, according to Town Council Chair and Republican majority leader Paul Chaplinsky, is that his caucus wants clarity on the long-term plan. That way, he and other town leaders can initiate discussions about the future uses of Derynoski and Flanders – discussions that they hope will assuage residents’ fear that the buildings will be demolished or sold off for development.

 

Background for the Rebuild

 

The district first began weighing its options for the elementary schools in earnest in 2021. The basic issue, according to Superintendent Steve Madancy, is modernization. Since 1950, when Derynoski was built, and 1966, when Kelley and Flanders opened, not much has changed in their built structures except for such things as the installation of LED lighting. Due to their age, the buildings are not the warm, safe, and dry places they need to be. Furthermore, the operational costs associated with outdated HVAC systems are growing every year.

 

Another reason given for the rebuild has to do with utilization. Every school has a certain maximum number of students it can serve – roughly speaking, the number of classrooms multiplied by the largest allowable class size for the grades in question. It is more cost-effective, in terms of energy use and administrative overhead, to operate schools close to that maximum number, with 85 to 90% utilization considered optimal.

 

None of Southington’s elementary schools currently lies within that range. According to district figures, Thalberg has the highest figure, 83%, followed by South End (79%), Derynoski (77%), Oshana (76%), Strong (76%), Hatton (75%), and Kelley (74%), with Flanders an outlier at just 63%.

 

This underutilization reflects the fact that the size of the student population has been slowly declining over the past two decades. Elementary enrollments peaked at around 3,100 in 2010, and have dipped since then to about 2,660.

 

Going forward, Southington – unlike many communities in Connecticut – has recently seen a modest increase in both births and the number of people moving to town. For that reason elementary school enrollment is expected to climb slowly over the next few years before stabilizing around a new peak of 2,850. That increase should raise utilization rates slightly, but would still leave most schools below 85%, with Flanders, again, at just 69%.

 

How should the district address these two issues – and do so at the least cost, and with the least possible disruption to student learning? To provide some answers, the town brought on a trio of outside consulting firms to take a close look at the numbers and game out various solutions. Last April 1, representatives from the firms MP Planning Group, Colliers, and Studio Jaed gave a presentation at DePaolo Middle School where they sketched out a number of alternative plans labelled A, B, C, and D, with various sub-options. (A video of the presentation can be viewed here.)


The reasoning that led them to recommend plan D-2 comes down to this: once implemented, it would ensure all students in the district were going to school in comfortable, modern, energy-efficient facilities, achieve an 88 percent utilization rate, and carry the smallest price tag. And that is the plan that is on the table now.


Chart summarizing the pros and cons of various plans for upgrading the four schools.		 SCREENSHOT FROM SOUTHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRESENTATION
Chart summarizing the pros and cons of various plans for upgrading the four schools. SCREENSHOT FROM SOUTHINGTON PUBLIC SCHOOLS PRESENTATION

Criticisms of the Plan

 

There is broad consensus within town that something needs to be done about its three oldest elementary schools. The construction of a new Kelley school has been received favorably, with some parents even calling for timeline on the project to be sped up.

 

But there have been plenty of criticisms as well. For starters, plan D-2 would not come cheap: last April the total budget for both phases was given as $173.7 million, of which the town’s share would be $97.2 million, paid for by issuing bonds. While the town has a top-notch credit rating, something that would keep the interest share of its debt service under control, it would need to budget an additional few million dollars each year to cover the cost of the project in the decades to come. Updated estimates for the project’s total cost will be presented at this Thursday’s Board of Education meeting.

 

A key sticking point for many residents is the proposed closure of Flanders. Some of those who went to school there or sent their children to Flanders have lamented the loss of a building that holds treasured memories. On the Facebook page Southington Talks, Sherrie Shover touched off a discussion that elicited more than 260 comments by writing, “I am not in support of this [closure], being a Flanders alumni myself and having a kids currently in and about to enter Flanders. I understand it's coming down to funding, and consolidation is needed for the other school projects to happen, but we don't need fewer schools here in town, especially a lovely neighborhood school. Isn't that why we live in Southington, for neighborhood schools like Flanders? It's one reason I wanted to stay in this town and live in the Flanders district.”

 

Like Shover, Board members Joe Baczewski and Terri Carmody noted after last April’s presentation that closing Flanders would fly in the face of the educational ideal called ‘neighborhood schools.’ This is the idea that students benefit from proximity to their schools because it allows them to have neighbors as classmates and shortens commute times; since schools also serve as hubs of community activity, proximity often means stronger community connection.

 

Another common criticism of the plan has to do with open space. Some commenters, especially on social media, have foreseen an endgame where the closing of Flanders gives the town the chance to sell the land to a developer and so eliminate one of the last tracts of unbuilt land in that area of town. In recent years, local resistance to new development has grown increasingly stiff, and the Flanders project has now become another flashpoint for this issue.

 

Weighing the Pros and Cons

 

The response to the first two criticisms has generally been to note that none of the alternatives are any better – they either allow conditions at the old schools to deteriorate further, are more disruptive to students’ educational experience, or cost more than the town can afford.

 

The consultants started by gaming out a scenario in which the town brought the facilities at the existing Kelley, Flanders, and Derynoski buildings up to modern standards. These upgrades would cost over $120 million – and leave the district with the same low utilization rate of about 80%.

 

The advantages of replacing Derynoski with a new school about one-third smaller than the original quickly became clear. Building a new school on a smaller footprint was actually projected to cost much less than upgrading the old one. So the question then became whether to close Kelley or Flanders.

 

One reason Flanders was chosen is that it has the lowest current utilization. Another is that it is in the close proximity to schools, Hatton and Thalberg, where students could be reassigned without added travel time; closing Kelley, by contrast, would put a commuting strain on families to its west.

 

Finally, the consultants determined that Flanders is not favorably situated for a rebuild. The current structure is on the best part of the site in terms of accessibility, and putting a building in any other location would create access difficulties. For Kelley, this is much less of a problem.


Urbin T. Kelley Elementary School
Urbin T. Kelley Elementary School

What to Do with the Old Buildings?

 

As for what will happen to the former Derynoski and Flanders buildings, no concrete proposals have been spelled out yet. That said, at a recent Districtwide Facilities Committee meeting, Chaplinsky floated some possibilities which share a common assumption – that the old Derynoski building and the Flanders school and field would remain in town hands.

 

One idea brought up at the meeting is to turn Derynoski into a multi-use building, with the classrooms converted into low-income units run by the town’s Housing Authority, the gym becoming a recreational venue, and the auditorium a space for community theater. Speaking of Flanders, Chaplinsky said it might make sense to consolidate various town operations there that are currently housed in smaller buildings all over Southington.

 

These ideas are very tentative, and could well hit unforeseen roadblocks; final decisions on the buildings’ use may have to wait for years. That said, town leaders have expressed a desire to preserve the structures, and in public meetings no one has advocated for turning them over to developers.

 

The Board of Education will vote on plan D-2 this Thursday, February 19. If it passes, it will then go to the Board of Finance and the Town Council. Should it also be approved there, phase one of the plan will go to a town-wide referendum, with a vote tentatively scheduled for June 2.


Walter A. Derynoski Elementary School
Walter A. Derynoski Elementary School





© 2025 The Southington Outsider        Logo image by CTDroneSource 

 

We pledge that all writing and images produced by staff of The Southington Outsider are created by humans, not by AI. We recommend, but cannot guarantee, that user-submitted Opinions, Tributes and Posters adhere to this policy. 

 

The Southington Outsider does not collect, use or share any individually identifiable data related to your browsing of this site. Wix, our hosting platform, has a separate privacy policy

bottom of page