top of page
Aerial view centered on the 500-block of Main Street in Southington, where the assault described in the article occurred. 	BING MAPS SCREENSHOT
Aerial view centered on the 500-block of Main Street in Southington, where the assault described in the article occurred. BING MAPS SCREENSHOT

This article is part of an occasional series called 'Last Responders' that will look at how the effects of tragic events that have taken place in town play out over time.

 

Early in the afternoon of July 20th of this year, a large group of youths and young adults on bicycles and e-bikes made their way down Route 10 from Plainville, taking over the roadway as they went. In addition to blocking traffic and putting themselves at risk, they interacted aggressively with motorists, threatening in at least two cases to ‘pop’ or shoot them. (In the end, no firearms were deployed or found on the person of any cyclist or driver.) Their ‘ride-out’ ended on Main Street just south of CVS, where six of their number surrounded a man riding a motorcycle and beat him.

 

The man in question was out on an errand with his wife, who was following behind him on a motorized trike. Both were traumatized by the incident and left with lingering questions about the response. They approached the Outsider to share their story and their concerns, but requested anonymity, which was granted after they presented credible evidence of threats from persons who participated in the ride-out. They are referred to below as ‘John’ and ‘Jane.'

 

The Southington Outsider is not in a position to corroborate all of the details of their account. However, what they said is broadly consistent with our earlier reporting, and with an official timeline of the police response that was shared with the Outsider by the Southington Police Department, which can be read below.


The interview has been lightly edited for clarity.

 

Narrative of Events

 

John: I believe she got the worst of it, because she saw it all happen - someone that she loves on the ground being stabbed.

 

Jane: This whole thing has been extremely difficult, and it’s been particularly difficult for me because I’ve been on long-term disability for six years.

 

John: We were at the doctor's office on Queen Street. She was on her trike, I was on my motorcycle. We were going to get corn at Carmody’s. We came around the corner and there were four cars in front of us. One turned into Derynoski, one turned into Walgreens, just to get away from the group. One car stops right in the middle of the road. I go around the car.

 

Jane: At this point I’m still stuck like an eighth of an mile behind him.

 

John: There was a kid on the yellow line, all masked up. There was a kid in the center doing a wheelie.

 

I went up to the kid doing the wheelie and said, “Why don’t you get the f- out of the road and let people get by? This is ridiculous.”

 

At this point they started circling around me saying ‘F- you old man, mind your own business, why don’t you get the f- out of here?”

 

I started revving my engine for them to get out of the way. I got up to the 500 block on Route 10. There was a landscaping truck in the middle of the road, so I couldn’t go anywhere. Now I’m looking back for her. There’s six cars between us now, and she has pulled over calling 9-1-1.

 

The kid rolls up, puts his hand in his backpack, and says “I’m going to pop you, old man.” At that point I can’t go anywhere. They’re saying "push him over, push him over!" I shut my bike off, I get off my bike. They say “grab his keys!” but there’s no keys, it’s a switch start. They say, “grab his phone!” and they grab my phone. I spun around to grab the kid who grabbed my phone, and he drops it.


Next thing I know six of them are on top of me, stabbing me with a screwdriver, beating me with an air pump. I fell on the ground, they start stomping on me. I’ve got four broken ribs, a bruised kidney. By that point she’s rolling up, screaming “get the f- off him!”

 

At that time people started coming to offer help. One gentleman jumped out of his car and showed his badge.


Jane: We still don't know who he was.


John: The adult who was stabbing me and another person were still on me. A neighbor started to intervene, saying to the kids “haven’t you done enough damage?” My wife was being taken care of by his wife and a woman in the front car. I was just all rage.

 

The cop showed up, pulled out his gun, and told the guy to get on the ground.

 

I asked the officer after all this happened, “Did I do anything wrong besides ask them to get the f- out of the road?” He said, “You could have asked him a little nicer.” A little nicer.

 

My motorcycle is registered, I wasn’t doing anything wrong. I was the fourth person assaulted that day.

 

Two Earlier Confrontations

 

John: Another gentleman was assaulted that day. It started in Norton Park in Plainville. They had an officer who had to escort them out of Plainville. As soon as they got out of Strawberry Fields [industrial park] there, they were all lined right up. We were told that Plainville notified Southington that 45 to 75 rowdy juveniles were coming into their town.

 

Another gentleman we've talked to was driving down the street. They kicked his mirror and spit in his car. When he went to pull over, the only reason they didn’t pull him out of the car is that he has a large dog.

 

It started before 1pm. He called the cops. They didn’t send anyone. He was still on 9-1-1 when he saw a cop pull in front of him. He told 9-1-1 to tell the officer that he was going to approach the vehicle. He told the officer what happened.

 

They continued down Route 10. All sorts of people were complaining. They stopped at the 7-11. The kids were swarming there. There was another gentleman named Jose. He told them to get the f- out of the road when they circled up on him coming out of Walmart. They threatened him: “We’re going to pop you.” He called the cops, but they didn’t respond. We were victims three and four.

 

Victim Services Hard to Come By

 

Jane: After the attack, I had called around to find out what happens when you’ve been assaulted. What do you do? I called a few different lawyers, and finally I called Martocchio and Oliveira. Martocchio got on the phone. He asked me a million questions. I told him the whole story. He said let me do some research and call you back.

 

He called me the next day and told me, very polite but firmly, I would have no case against the town because of governmental immunity. And I hung up. I was stunned. I wasn’t calling to sue the town, I was looking for help.

 

Who helps us now? I called the Town Manager’s office, but nobody answered. So I call the Town Attorney’s office. There’s got to be services available through them, I thought. I call the number, and what do I hear? “Martocchio and Oliveira, how can I help you?” I never knew [Martocchio and the Town Attorney] were the same person.

 

We turned to victim services at the court in Waterbury. Again, nothing. It’s a closet where they give you a fidget spinner and a box of tissues. They printed out 40 pages of Psychology Today and gave it to me.

 

What the victim’s advocate said to me was, "It’s called the criminal justice system, it’s not called the victim’s justice system." At that point I realized she was right. The state pays the judge, the advocate, the prosecutor, the corrections system. Meanwhile we’re drowning in debt from bills.

 

The 13-year old was from Cheshire, the 20-year old was from Waterbury. But there were six of them. To only get two?

 

The thing that got us was they put the 20-year old on a $500,000 cash bond. They lowered that to $50,000. We did not get a phone call from the prosecutor that they lowered the bail. We’ve been told nothing and we have nothing to do with it.

 

Identifying the Root Issues

 

Jane: The town isn’t looking at it the right way. This isn’t about an ordinance. I know for me personally, when I finally got out of the house [after a period of disability], we got an electric bike and I was able to go out on the rail trail for a while. They need to separate the issue of adults who truly utilize these as a tool, because they helped me. They need to deal with these kids separately.

 

John: It's not just e-bikes. There were scooters, there were bicycles, and there were e-bikes.

 

The whole reason this happened is because they wanted Tiktok views. Apparently my assault has over a million views. It was covered in California on biker sites.

 

Jane: They posted my picture on Tiktok on my bike saying I’m easy to find.

 

John: I’ve been married twice, I’ve been divorced, I’m a recovering addict. The one thing I’ve taught my kids is to have respect. These kids, they have respect for nothing, nothing at all. It makes me sad that these kids have no repercussions for anything.

 

And if I could change one thing, I would have had the police do a better job. Because this didn’t have to happen. The first call, it was incumbent on the police department to intervene.


[End of Interview]

 

The Southington Police Department Dispatch Record

 

The Southington Police Department declined to speak on the record about the events in question. However, they shared a copy of the dispatch log for July 20 detailing where and when the Department received various reports and took various actions. It is included here as another detailed piece of testimony to what happened that day.

 

1:09pm. Phone call received by Southington Police Department [SPD] Dispatch from caller reporting a group of juveniles on E-Bikes operating erratically in the area of 750 Queen Street. Caller reported they were traveling towards Plainville.


1:10pm. A CAD [report] was created by Dispatch for the above call for service. First responding officers reported the group was observed traveling westbound onto Townline Road and northbound onto South Washington Street in Plainville.


1:12: A responding officer reports they received a walk-up complaint of a group of bicycles and E-Bikes traveling northbound into Plainville on Route 10. Dispatch was advised to contact Plainville. A dispatcher was still on the telephone with the original caller gathering details when this Officer provided this report.


1:12: SPD Dispatch received another 9-1-1 call reporting the group of juveniles on bikes deliberately holding up traffic in Plainville. Caller reported the group is now in Plainville as she was following.


1:12: Plainville PD was attempted to be contacted three times by Southington Police Department Dispatch but there appeared to be an issue with the Plainville PD phone lines.


1:14: Southington PD contacted Plainville PD over the police radio hotline and advised Plainville PD of the group of cyclists heading into their town.


1:29: Southington PD Dispatch receives a 9-1-1 call reporting that there were juveniles on E-Bikes blocking the roadway and creating hazards. Caller reported the kids struck his mirror. Caller reported he was unsure where he was, but believed the juveniles were now on Queen Street and were possibly going onto the bicycle trail.


1:31: Another call is received that the group is traveling southbound on Queen Street passing BJ’s/Spring Street. The Queen Street officer radioed that they were aware and last saw them near Aircraft.


1:33: SPD Dispatch advises Queen Street Officer that the caller from 1329 hours is flashing his high beams in an attempt to speak with him. The officer meets with the complainant and investigates.


1:36: Another call was received about the group traveling southbound on Queen Street by Smashburger, but the caller was unaware where the group went.


1:47: Call is received by SPD Dispatch of the group traveling on Route 10.


1:50: Another call is received regarding the group traveling southbound on Queen Street. Caller reported the group “pump faked” having a fake firearm but did not see any weapons. Caller reported one of the riders reported to having a firearm, but reported the group continued to travel.


1:53: Dispatch sends an Officer to check the area of Stop & Shop on North Main for the group of bicyclists.


1:54: Another officer is dispatched to Dunkin Donuts to meet with the complainant from the 1:50 call regarding the group of bicyclists. (Three officers are now checking area and meeting with various callers.)


1:58: 9-1-1 call received that the group of bicyclists were now traveling towards Gasman and Plantsville Center being disruptive.


1:59: Another 9-1-1 call reporting that a motorcyclist and the group were fighting.


1:59: All available patrol units were dispatched to Main Street on the reported fight involving the group of bicyclists and a motorcycle operator. It was reported that a potential firearm was involved.


2:00: Sergeant DiBattista requested drone deployment.


2:01: Officers advise over the radio that they are beginning to arrive on scene (4 officers arrive to the area at approximately the same time).


2:02: Other Officers en route are reporting seeing a group going south from Factory Square, and were now seen by Railroad Ave.


2:04: Officer advises he is already out with the victim on Main Street. Officers stopped and detained a suspect that was located away from the scene. They were arrested after an investigation was conducted.







The property tax bill. 	PHILIP THIBODEAU PHOTOS
The property tax bill. PHILIP THIBODEAU PHOTOS

Editor's note: This the first of two articles on Southington's recent revaluation process and its impact on real estate tax bills. The second, scheduled for publication next week, will take a look at the effects of revaluation on non-residential properties.


“It’s too much,” said long-time Southington resident Phil Santopietro. “The schools are wonderful. We have a great house that we had built, and we love it. But how can you afford it anymore?”

 

Santopietro was speaking about the increase in his property tax bill, which in his case jumped this past year nearly three-times the current 3.4% inflation rate. He was just one of many residents who reacted with a mix of disbelief, outrage, and fatalism when they opened the envelopes containing their bills.

 

It was not supposed to be this way. This past spring, town officials worked together to cap the overall growth of the town’s operating budget at a relatively modest 2.7%.

 

Once the budget was finalized, the Board of Finance voted to slash the mill rate – the tax rate, expressed in tenths of a percent – for local real estate from 32.80 to 23.29.

 

The reason the board implemented such a drastic cut was to offset a sharp spike in real estate values over the past five years. Revaluation - the process of updating official estimates of property values - showed that, since the last time Southington assessed its properties in 2020, the combined values of all real estate in town increased by roughly two-fifths. The mill rate cut, which was also roughly two-fifths, was meant to compensate for that growth.

 

Yet the increase in real estate values after revaluation was not evenly distributed. Small houses and condominiums, for example, soared in value over the past five years, in some cases more than doubling, due largely to demand.

 

Meanwhile, larger homes, for which there was less demand, also rose in value, but at a less dramatic rate, closer to the two-fifths average. Finally, certain kinds of commercial real estate, such as big-box stores and undeveloped land, gained little in value.

 

The upshot: even though the mill rate cut kept the average property bill increase close to 2.7%, the vast majority of homeowners saw their bills rise.

 

Residential Property Tax Hikes

 

Tax bills, like property records, are public information. They can be accessed on the town’s website, on a page maintained by Vision Government Solutions. With the help of a computer script that dumped that information into a spreadsheet, we were able to study property bills by street address and category.

 

The results were eye-opening. In general, homeowners with small- or medium-sized residences saw much larger increases in their property taxes than the owners of large properties, at least in percentage terms. This was easiest to see when focusing on streets or developments with similar-sized residences all built at around the same time. For example:

 

Condominiums at The Meadows: 62.0% Average Increase

 

The Meadows condominium complex on Darling Street, built in 1978, has a mix of 1-, 2-, and 3-bedroom units that average about 900 square feet each.

 
WWII-Era Duplexes on John Street: 38.9% Average Increase
 

All the homes on John Street, just off of Mill, are two-family brick buildings constructed around 1944. Each family residence is about 800 square feet in size.

 
Condominiums on Village Road: 22.3% Average Increase

 

Village Road runs through Spring Lake Village, a 55+ condo complex built in the early 1970’s. Residences on this road average 1,200 square feet.

 

Post-War Capes on Pondview Drive: 21.6% Average Increase

 

The Pondview Drive development dates to the mid 1950’s. Individual homes average 1,200 square feet, though with considerable variation.

 

1970’s Single-family Homes on Harness Drive: 10.0% Average Increase

 

The Harness Drive development dates to the early 1970’s. Most homes there are between 1,300 and 1,800 square feet.

 
1970’s Single-family Homes on High Tower Road: 4.2% Average Increase

 

The High Tower development was constructed around the same time as the one on Harness. However, its houses tend to be larger, with most between 1,800 and 2,100 square feet.

 
1980’s Single-family Homes on North Star Drive: 2.8% Average Increase

 

The original homes on North Star were built in the late 1980’s. Homes there range from 2,500 to over 4,000 square feet.

 

In short, the only home owners whose tax increases were in line with the town’s 2.7% budget growth were those who owned the largest houses. Almost everyone else paid more.


The Meadows Condominium complex, which saw one of the highest increases in average property tax this year.
The Meadows Condominium complex, which saw one of the highest increases in average property tax this year.

A Local Version of a National Problem

 

What happened in Southington has been affecting almost every community in the United States that collects local property taxes. And why that is so remains something of a mystery.

 

As a rule, real estate assessments are conducted by private vendors rather than municipalities. Southington’s revaluation was done by Fairfield-based Municipal Valuation Services LLC. On their website, Municipal Valuation describes their method of appraisal this way:

 

“In a Revaluation, the value of your property is based on an analysis of the entire Town/City’s real estate market for the period of time selected by the Assessor (typically it consists of 12 to 24 months of sales prior to October 1st of reval year). A study is done of sales that occurred during this period, so that the Revaluation Company can establish valuation parameters such as construction tables, land rates, market adjustment tables etc. When these valuation parameters are applied to the properties that sold, the resulting value should be very close to its sales price. After testing these valuation parameters, the Revaluation Company will then apply these valuation parameters to all properties in the town/city. By doing so, the Revaluation Company is approximating the market value for every property in town from information derived from all town sales.”

 

In other words, the company deploys a computer algorithm that collects a property’s features and makes a comparison with similar properties to estimate its sale price, and thus its market value. (The popular real estate website Zillow does something similar.)

 

Revaluation practices must adhere to government rules and industry standards. Yet a study of 26 million home sales nationwide by Christopher Berry of the University of Chicago showed that, over the past few decades, less expensive homes have been assessed more generously than more expensive ones. As a result, people who own more modest properties have been paying taxes at a higher effective rate, even when the mill rate was the same for all.

 

There is no consensus as to why this happens. Berry pointed to a flaw in the assessment process: assessors are not allowed to enter people’s homes. Thus, they assume that the value and quality of the interior match the value and quality of the exterior, which is often not the case.

 

As if to illustrate the point, Southington resident Christopher Platt Jr., whose tax bill went up nearly 16% this year, told the Outsider that the assessment misrepresented his house’s interior amenities. “The assessment was wrong,” he wrote. “It said I had a finished basement.”

 

He said that he could have appealed, although he was not inclined to: “It’s done by a third party, which muddies the waters. They want you to testify. I would just show them pics of my supposed finished basement where I have no drop ceiling and the foundation is the walls.”

 

To file a successful appeal, it is often not enough to show officials a picture. Generally it takes time, and some expertise, to find the right kind of ‘comps’ or comparisons that would prove that one’s property is an outlier.

 

What Can the Town Do?

 

The town government strove to keep spending in line this past spring, growing its budget by less than the rate of inflation. But while every bit of fiscal prudence helps, in most cases these cuts were dwarfed by the effects of a market and a revaluation process that has behaved in a rather crazy way. For example, if your real estate tax bill went up 15% from $6,000 to $6,900, about $162 of that increase was due to growth in the town budget. The remaining $738 was due to the action of the market – or at least the market modeled by Municipal Valuations.

 

So the realistic answer to the question, what can the town do, is: not much.

 

Officials are keeping their eyes peeled for a market rebalance. It could happen that the rate at which large homes increase in value catches up with the rate at which small homes do so, or that the rate of small home appreciation slows relative to that of larger homes. If something like that were to happen, the town could hold an early revaluation rather than wait until 2030, when the next one is scheduled. According to Town Council Chair Paul Chaplinsky, that is one option on the table.

 

“If property values in our area appear to drop or shift significantly prior to the next scheduled 2030/2031 revaluation,” he told the Outsider, “this… would not be reflected by the town’s tax department because it occurred in between revaluation dates. If this scenario happens, [Board of Finance Chair] John Leary and I… would be supportive of petitioning the elected boards to do an off-cycle revaluation to reflect the lower valuation and appropriate tax burden change. The message… is that we are keeping an eye on this and if there is a way to provide that relief, we will seek it out.”

 

Another option would be for officials to shop around for a valuation agency that has a flatter valuation curve, one that avoids the distortions Berry has drawn attention to.

 

For now, though, most Southington residents must contend with another unexpected hike in the money they need to pay to keep a roof over their head.







 

Rendering of the proposed structure at 20 Spring St. 	SOLLI ENGINEERING SLIDE
Rendering of the proposed structure at 20 Spring St. SOLLI ENGINEERING SLIDE

One of the first buildings visitors to Southington see if they take the westbound ramp off I-84 onto Queen Street has lain vacant since May, after the previous occupant, restaurant Plan B, shut down.

 

Now that may change, if a developer’s proposal for the property at 20 Spring Street receives town approval.

 

According to the plan, which was reviewed by Planning and Zoning Tuesday night, the 5,020 square foot property would be partitioned into two spaces of roughly equal size.

 

The space on the north side of the building would be occupied by a CAVA. CAVA – not to be confused with Cava Italian Restaurant on West Street – is relatively new, nationwide fast-food chain that specializes in Mediterranean-themed food.

 

The space on the south side of the structure would be occupied by a Panda Express. Panda Express, a more established fast-food chain, features what it calls ‘American Chinese cuisine.’

 

The two restaurants, which are described in the application as “high-turnover,” are clearly designed to appeal to travelers coming off the interstate for a quick pit stop.

 

To keep that turnover going, the Panda Express would also have a drive-thru window.

 

Comments made by members of Planning and Zoning at Tuesday night’s meeting focused on two areas: aesthetics and traffic burden.

 

Commissioner Mike Goodrich asked the presenter, Paul Rodrigues from Solli Engineering, to develop a fuller plan for landscaping the edges of the property, given its visibility and the presence of two dumpster pads on the site.

 

In addition, several members of the commission expressed concern about effects the proposed businesses would have on the traffic flow at one of Southington’s busiest intersections. The drive-thru and the proposed 62 parking spaces point to a large number of vehicles coming in and out.

 

Commissioner Susan Locks noted that the exit queu from the Chili’s across the street is often backed up. “So,” she said, “if we have a backup across the street, it’s going to become a nightmare.”

 

Commissioner Caleb Cowles told Rodrigues that when the traffic study comes out, they are going to be looking carefully at the impact on the queue on Spring Street.

 

Commission Chair Steve Walowski wrapped up the commission’s comments by alluding to restrictions that had been placed on the previous owners by the town to enhance traffic flow, and noted that the same restrictions may be on the table. He observed that the previous establishment “was a little more passive,” and that “adding a drive-thru… is a whole other animal.”


Planning and Zoning tabled any final decision on the application until its next meeting.

 

181 Main Street Proposal

 

In other Planning and Zoning news, the former site of Thai Spice at 181 Main Street will also be undergoing a major change if the town approves a plan presented by Kratzert, Jones & Associates on behalf of the property owner, Dong Qi Kai.

 

Under the plan, the existing structure would be demolished and a new, two-story building constructed in its place.

 

The first floor of the building would be designated for retail, while the second floor would have two studio apartments.

 

Comments from the commission on the plan were generally positive.


Proposed building at 181 Main St. 		KRATZERT, JONES & ASSOCIATES SLIDE
Proposed building at 181 Main St. KRATZERT, JONES & ASSOCIATES SLIDE


© 2026 The Southington Outsider        Logo image by CTDroneSource 

 

We pledge that all writing and images produced by staff of The Southington Outsider are created by humans, not by AI. We recommend, but cannot guarantee, that user-submitted Opinions, Tributes and Posters adhere to this policy. 

 

The Southington Outsider does not collect, use or share any individually identifiable data related to your browsing of this site. Wix, our hosting platform, has a separate privacy policy. 

bottom of page